Auto-Rx Customers Questions & Answers

Visit Auto-Rx® Home Page
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Better results using Conventional or same with Synthetic?


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Better results using Conventional or same with Synthetic?
Permalink  
 


Hey everyone, I just had a question that I've been pondering with for the past few days. I'm currently on the clean phase of my 2nd application on my 1995 Acura Integra (LS, Non-VTEC) and I was just debating what to use for my rinse phase. I used Valvoline for the Clean/Rinse phase on my first application and I used Havoline for my current Clean phase. I have a bunch of synthetic that I have stored in my basement that I'd like to use up though, and was wondering if I'd likely see the same results using a Group III synthetic such as Pennzoil Platinum or Havoline Synthetic as I would using a conventional like Valvoline, Castrol GTX, Quaker State or Havoline. Any thoughts? If I would get better results using conventional, I'll just continue using that. Thanks a lot! :)

__________________
1995 Acura Integra LS - 134,900 - Havoline DS 5w30/SuperTech ST3593A/ARX Clean #2


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink  
 

I recommend that you stick with what you're doing. Those would probably work, but I would extend the rinse phase by 500 miles.

__________________
2001 Ford Ranger, 4.0 V6.
Mobil 1 0w-30, Motorcraft FL 820s filter, 3oz Auto Rx


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 786
Date:
Permalink  
 

Stay with your current oil.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us